26/02/2017

Photography Exercise 2

I choose photographs which I thought looks artistic from my albums.












I like those photographs, especially for their strangeness. The distortion makes the first two photographs they look interestingly for me. The last photograph was over exposed, but after some adjustments, it is the light which makes the object curiously illuminated.

If there is a mental process triggered by watching a photograph (or anything), it is a prove it is "artistic".

I know that when I can shoot a thousand photographs and only a few have the charge to trigger the mental process.
"The context in which a photograph is seen... [affects] ...the meanings a viewer draws from it." 
(Shore, 2010, p 26) (Creative arts today, p 150)

25/02/2017

My first Camera Obscura

I wanted to see how the Camera Obscura works. As a first place, I choose an office of my colleague at work. The hardest part was to make a dark but it was overcome. The image of the world projected through a small hole was not sharp and visible as I expected. The visibility was low but when photographed with long exposition the world behind small hole revealed. I used Samyang 8 mm, 30 sec., shutter 33. It was an interesting feeling to be inside the dark and watch the projected image.








19/02/2017

Exercise 1 Photography

What, in your view, makes photographs unique as an art form?

I think it is the frozen reality, the instant record of an event, the "precise" flat record of a part of the world around us since 1840. We can see objects, people, nature as they actually look like, the art is there when seeing it triggers the mind thinking process.

Photograph and time:

Any photograph is taken in the present. What does it mean? When we look at a picture, we see a past of something which could not be repeated. The photograph is a window into the past of the world which is not same as before. It was a strange feeling to see "first" photographs from 1840 by Talbot, really there were significant changes in the space? What changed are objects, fashion architecture maybe, but the human being and nature look same.

What we mean by 'photographic image'?

We have a digital version of photographs which we can see everywhere especially on a PC screen when we use the internet. Anything which looks as real image is considered as it was a photograph. Even a realistic painting can be considered it is a photograph. There is another thing to be considered, and it is a manipulation. It is a photographic image as well.

Is there a difference between a printed photograph and digital image?

It is an interesting question, I think the printed photograph is a real object build by a matter instead of a digital image which is constructed by a screen. We can see printed photograph by natural light, the digital image we can see only if there is the electricity. I like the idea that printed version is an object of a paper, layers of mixed paints. Both versions are projected through our eyes on the retina and translated to the mind.

Research point

Wallaston's camera Lucida

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zwb_dNEh8MQ

A great tool to make a right proportion of objects. It is said that great artists use it to paint their masterpieces.

Do you see photography as mechanical or creative?

It is not an easy question. We have here a record equipment (camera) - it is obvious it is a mechanical thing, and on the other hand, we have a human being who use it this mechanical piece. The way how it is used could be creative or not. It could be used as a documentary camera in police work for instance and it could be used to take pictures in a creative way to become an Art. Anyway, to get the photograph you need a  sensitive thing of light (camera) and the process of taking pictures could be creative.